Posted on Wednesday, 8 December 2010
8888888________888888_
88888888______8888888_
8888_8888____8888_888_
8888__8888__8888__888_
8888___88888888___888_
8888____888888____888_
8888_____8888_____888_
8888______88______888_
8888______________888_
8888______________888_

88888____________88888_
88888____________88888_
88888____________88888_
88888____________88888_
88888____________88888_
88888____________88888_
88888____________88888_
888888__________888888_
_888888________888888__
__888888888888888888___
____88888888888888_____

____88888888888888_____
__88888888888888888____
_888888________88888___
_88888_________________
_88888_________________
_88888_________________
_88888_________________
_88888_________________
_888888________88888___
__88888888888888888____
____88888888888888_____

888888__________888888_
888888__________888888_
888888__________888888_
888888__________888888_
8888888888888888888888_
8888888888888888888888_
8888888888888888888888_
888888__________888888_
888888__________888888_
888888__________888888_
888888__________888888_

______8888888888____________________
____888888888888888_________________
__888888822222228888________________
_88888822222222288888_______________
888888222222222228888822228888______
888882222222222222288222222222888___
8888822222222222222222222222222288__
_8888822222222222222222222222222_88_
__88888222222222222222222222222__888
___888822222222222222222222222___888
____8888222222222222222222222____888
_____8888222222222222222222_____888_
______8882222222222222222_____8888__
_______888822222222222______888888__
________8888882222______88888888____
_________888888_____888888888_______
__________88888888888888____________
___________888888888
Read More
Posted on
Got a few pounds to lose? Cancel the gym membership. An increasing body of research reveals that exercise does next to nothing for you when it comes to losing weight. A result for couch potatoes, yes, but also one that could have serious implications for the government's long-term health strategy

My mum used to complain that she couldn't lose weight. A size 18 and a couple of stone heavier than ideal, she tried in vain for years to shed the extra. Every week she headed to the gym, where she pounded the treadmill like a paratrooper, often three times a week. Most days she took the dog for a brisk, hour-long walk. She didn't eat unhealthily – the rest of the family ate exactly the same meals, and did a fraction of the exercise she did. She ought to have been the slimmest of the bunch: that she remained overweight was a frustration to her, and a mystery to all of us.

From StairMasters to kettlebells, Rosemary Conley to Natalie Cassidy, we understand and expect that getting in shape is going to require serious effort on our part – and the reverse is true, too, that we expect exercise to pay back the hours of boring, sweaty graft with a leaner, lighter body. Since the days of the Green Goddess, we've known that the healthiest way to lose weight is through exercise. It's science, isn't it?

Well, science has some bad news for you. More and more research in both the UK and the US is emerging to show that exercise has a negligible impact on weight loss. That tri-weekly commitment to aerobics class? Almost worthless, as far as fitting into your bikini is concerned. The Mayo Clinic, a not-for-profit medical research establishment in the US, reports that, in general, studies "have demonstrated no or modest weight loss with exercise alone" and that "an exercise regimen… is unlikely to result in short-term weight loss beyond what is achieved with dietary change."

It sounds faintly heretical, if not downright facetious. And it's a scientific discovery that most health professionals are, naturally, keen to downplay. After all, exercise is still good for us. It's just that, in defiance of decades of New Year resolutions, it's unlikely to make us slim.

Most of us have a grasp of the rudiments of weight gain and loss: you put energy (calories) into your body through food, you expend them through movement, and any that don't get burned off are stored in your body as fat. Unfortunately, the maths isn't in our favour. "In theory, of course, it's possible that you can burn more calories than you eat," says Dr Susan Jebb, head of nutrition and health research at the Medical Research Council, and one of the government's go-to academics for advice on nutrition. "But you have to do an awful lot more exercise than most people realise. To burn off an extra 500 calories is typically an extra two hours of cycling. And that's about two doughnuts."

From a practical perspective, then, exercise is never going to be an effective way of slimming, unless you have the training schedule – and the willpower – of an Olympic athlete. "It's simple maths," says Professor Paul Gately, of the Carnegie Weight Management institution in Leeds. "If you want to lose a pound of body fat, then that requires you to run from Leeds to Nottingham, but if you want to do it through diet, you just have to skip a meal for seven days." Both Jebb and Gately are keen to stress that there is plenty of evidence that exercise can add value to a diet: "It certainly does maximise the amount you lose as fat rather than tissue," Jebb points out. But Gately sums it up: "Most people, offered the choice, are going to go for the diet, because it's easier to achieve."

There's another, more insidious, problem with pinning all your hopes for a holiday bod on exercise. In what has become a defining experiment at the University of Louisiana, led by Dr Timothy Church, hundreds of overweight women were put on exercise regimes for a six-month period. Some worked out for 72 minutes each week, some for 136 minutes, and some for 194. A fourth group kept to their normal daily routine with no additional exercise.

Against all the laws of natural justice, at the end of the study, there was no significant difference in weight loss between those who had exercised – some of them for several days a week – and those who hadn't. (Church doesn't record whether he told the women who he'd had training for three and half hours a week, or whether he was wearing protective clothing when he did.) Some of the women even gained weight.

Church identified the problem and called it "compensation": those who exercised cancelled out the calories they had burned by eating more, generally as a form of self-reward. The post-workout pastry to celebrate a job well done – or even a few pieces of fruit to satisfy their stimulated appetites – undid their good work. In some cases, they were less physically active in their daily life as well.

His findings are backed up by a paper on childhood obesity published in 2008 by Boston academics Steven Gortmaker and Kendrin Sonneville. In an 18-month study investigating what they call "the energy gap" – the daily imbalance between energy intake and expenditure — the pair showed that when the children in their experiment exercised, they ended up eating more than the calories they had just burned, sometimes 10 or 20 times as many. "Although physical activity is thought of as an energy-deficit activity," they wrote, "our estimates do not support this hypothesis."





In the 1950s, the celebrated French-American nutritionist Jean Mayer was the first to introduce a link between exercise and weight reduction. Until then, the notion that physical activity might help you lose weight was actually rather unfashionable in the scientific community – in the 1930s, a leading specialist had persuasively argued that it was more effective to keep patients on bed rest.

Over the course of his career, Mayer's pioneering studies – on rats, babies and schoolgirls – demonstrated that the less active someone was, the more likely they were to be fat. Mayer himself, the son of two eminent physiologists, and a Second World War hero to boot, became one of the world's leading figures in nutrition and most influential voices in the sphere of public health. As an advisor to the White House and to the World Health Organisation, he drew correlations between exercise and fitness that triggered a revolution in thinking on the subject in the 60s and 70s. "Getting fit" became synonymous not just with healthier living, but with a leaner, meaner body, and the ground was laid for a burgeoning gym industry.

Each successive postwar generation was enjoying an increasingly sedentary lifestyle, and those lifestyles have been accompanied by an apparently inexorable increase in obesity. Three in five UK adults are now officially overweight. And type II diabetes, which used to be a disease that affected you at the end of your life, is now the fastest-rising chronic disorder in paediatric clinics.

But have we confused cause and effect? Terry Wilkin, professor of endocrinology and metabolism at the Peninsula Medical School in Plymouth, argues that we have. The title of his latest research is: "Fatness leads to inactivity, but inactivity does not lead to fatness". Wilkin is nearing the end of an 11-year study on obesity in children, which has been monitoring the health, weight and activity levels of 300 subjects since the age of five. When his team compared the more naturally active children with the less active ones, they were surprised to discover absolutely no difference in their body fat or body mass.

That's not to say that exercise is not making the children healthy in other ways, says Wilkin, just that it's having no palpable effect on their overall size and shape. "And that's a fundamental issue," he adds, "because governments, including ours, use body mass as an outcome measure." In other words, obesity figures are not going to improve through government-sponsored programmes that focus primarily on exercise while ignoring the behemoth of a food industry that is free to push high-calorie junk to kids (and, for that matter, adults).

For one thing, Wilkin believes he has discovered another form of "compensation", similar to Timothy Church's discovery that we reward ourselves with food when we exercise. Looking at the question of whether it was possible to change a child's physical activity, Wilkin's team put accelerometers on children at schools with very different PE schedules: one which offered 1.7 hours a week, and another that offered nine hours.

"The children did 64% more PE at the second school. But when they got home they did the reverse. Those who had had the activity during the day flopped and those who hadn't perked up, and if you added the in-school and out-of-school together you got the same. From which we concluded that physical activity is controlled by the brain, not by the environment – if you're given a big opportunity to exercise at one time of day you'll compensate at another."

Wilkin argues that the environmental factors we tend to obsess about in the fight against obesity – playing fields, PE time in school, extracurricular activities, parental encouragement – are actually less of a factor in determining what exercise we do than our own bodies. "An evolutionary biologist would say physical activity is the only voluntary means you have of varying or regulating your energy expenditure. In other words, what physical activity you do is not going to be left to the city council to decide. It's going to be controlled, fundamentally, from within."

His thesis has caused controversy among his peers – there have been cavils that his study sample is inconclusively small – and not all obesity experts appreciate the message. "We haven't had the sensitivity in the studies to really determine the longitudinal determinants of obesity in children yet," says Dr Ken Fox, professor of exercise and health science at Bristol University and advisor to the government's obesity strategy. "It's far too early to start discounting things as important as physical activity. Those who are saying it has no impact are neglecting a huge amount of the literature. I am suspicious of anyone who polarises obesity as one thing over another when there is strong agreement that it has multiple causes."

"Terry's point is right," says Paul Gately, "but it's not right in the context of public health promotion. In people who have lost weight and kept weight off, physical activity is almost always involved. And those people who just do diet are more likely to fail, as are those who just do exercise. You need a combination of the two, because we're talking about human beings, not machines. We know that dietary behaviour is quite a negative behaviour – we're having to deny ourselves something. There aren't any diets out there that people enjoy. But people do enjoy being physically active."

"What we want to avoid is people thinking they can control their weight simply by dieting," adds Jebb, who points out that this is the very scenario that encourages anorexia in teenage girls. "Just restricting your diet is not going to be the healthiest way to live." Traditional dieting clubs like Weightwatchers and Slimming World promote exercise as a key part of a weight-loss strategy: scientific studies show that exercise is an important factor in maintaining weight loss and, Jebb adds, some studies suggest it can help in preventing weight gain.

But it is still much harder to exercise when you're already overweight, and "high energy density" foods are quick to get us there – overeating by just 100 calories a day can lead to a weight increase of 10lb over a year. "Education must come first," says Wilkin. "Eating habits have to change to a much lower calorie intake, much lower body weight, and we would be fitter as a result because we would be able to do more physical activity." He would like to see higher levels of tax on calorie-dense food, similar to those levied on tobacco, which have proved effective in the campaign against smoking.

Does the coalition government – which will launch a White Paper on the subject this autumn – agree? Anne Milton, minister for public health, is not keen to commit to any particular strategy before its publication. "There's not a magic bullet here," she says. "Despite the best efforts of government actually the public's health hasn't improved hugely.Change4Life [the government's current healthy-living initiative] is doing a good job. But we think there's still lots more we can do with it."

Any drastic measures to curb the excesses of junk food marketing seem unlikely – both Milton and Secretary of State for Health Andrew Lansley stress the importance of working "with" industry – and much of her language is concerned with "individual choice". When it comes to losing weight, it seems there's only one real choice – stop eating so much food.



Running on empty: fat is a feminine issue

The good news The latest scientific findings from the US suggest that an intense workout in the gym is actually less effective than gentle exercise in terms of weight loss. Barry Braun, associate professor of kinesiology at the University of Massachusetts, says that the evidence emerging from his research team shows that moderate exercise such as "low-intensity ambulation" (ie walking) may help to burn calories "without triggering a caloric compensation effect" – ie without making you reach for a snack the moment you're done. In one experiment, Braun showed that simply standing up instead of sitting used up hundreds more calories a day without increasing appetite hormones in your blood.

The bad news Perhaps offering one reason for a multi-billion-pound weight-loss industry aimed almost exclusively at women, research has confirmed that it is more difficult for women to shed the pounds than men, because women's bodies are simply more efficient at storing fat. In one of Braun's experiments, in which overweight men and women were monitored while walking on treadmills, the women's blood levels of insulin decreased while appetite hormones increased; the men's, meanwhile, displayed no such change. "Across the evidence base, it seems that it's tougher for women to lose weight than men," affirms Ken Fox, professor of exercise and health sciences at Bristol University.




Read More
Posted on
<span>Humor is something that thrives between man's aspirations and his limitations. There is more logic in humor than in anything else. Because, you see, humor is truth. ~ Victor Borge </span>



Having a funny disposition can prove a positive way of viewing life and your place in the world. A good sense of humor has many benefits, from personal happiness to making you the life and soul of a party, to helping you see the lighter side of life and sharing your irreverent sense of challenging situations with those more seriously inclined. Being funny is recognized as an important part of job hires too – a survey of 737 CEOs found that 98 percent of them favored hiring someone with a sense of humor over someone who didn't display such a sense.[1]

Being funny is not about being flippant or frivolous – it's about being genuinely humorous and encouraging other people to have a good laugh. And while it might be a little challenging changing your outlook about the role of good humor in your life, being funny is something innate, and wanting to be funnier is the first fabulous step to becoming that way! Shuck off your stern self and tickle your funny bone with the following fun steps!

Steps






Funny is innate!Trust in your innate sense of humor. Being funny doesn't come in "one-size-fits-all"; what makes you funny is unique to you and the way you observe the world. Focus first on what you find funny in life and learn from your own reactions to the things that make you laugh. Trust that you do have a funny bone – as babies we laugh from 4 months of age, and all children express humor naturally from kindergarten age, using humor to entertain themselves and others, with riddles, knock knock jokes, laughing at themselves, and even using physical slapstick humor.[2] So it's already in you – you just need to bring it forth again!
Find the things that make you laugh. Search for books, movies, TV shows, photos, stories, words, poems, people, work incidents, pet follies, near catastrophes, etc., that you've found funny. Keep a note of them.
Do funny things and enjoy the things that make you laugh more often. Indulge in reading a comic strip, share jokes with the kids, give in to "silly things" just because they're funny, and laugh as often as you can.






Friends are a great source of funnyLearn a little about what makes us laugh. Laughter is generally the desired result of anyone seeking to be funny, and usually this is because we view laughter as a sign of happiness or as a release of tension. Laughter itself is unconscious – while it is possible for us to inhibit our laughter consciously (although not always successfully!), it is very hard for us to produce laughter on demand, and doing so will usually seem "forced".[3][4] Fortunately, laughter is very contagious (we're about 30 times more likely to laugh in the presence of others),[5] and in a social context, it's easy to start laughing when others are laughing.[6] Getting people to laugh, therefore, requires genuine humor, which is definitely about more than reciting hackneyed jokes!
What makes us laugh foremost includes feeling a sense of superiority over someone else behaving "dumber" than us, or being surprised by the incongruity of something, or by feeling a welcomed relief from an anxiety.[7] And for many of us, seeing our own frustrations reflected back at us by someone who clearly understands a familiar predicament or situation and injects levity into responding to it nearly always improves our mood!
Keep in mind that while good joke-telling is an art form in and of itself, it is not a requisite for being funny. Not being able to remember jokes does not doom you to being humorless! Indeed, research by scientists at Washington State University has shown that a joke poorly told can be funny in its own right depending on who you tell it to; it's possible we have a tendency to find being let down by bad humor cause for amusement too![8]
Different things make different people laugh – it's important to keep this in mind when it doesn't seem that someone is responsive to your being funny.






Incongruity is funny!Learn the key foundations of being funny. In a nutshell, as good comedians already know, being funny boils down to good timing and taking the best advantage of the context. This is why learning long lists of jokes won't necessarily make you "funny" because you still need to grasp the levity of a situation as it's unfolding before you, within the context of those present and the precise facts of each situation. Here are some of the basic components of being funny:
Misleading the mind, surprise, or cognitive incongruity: Verbal jokes use this element to the greatest level possible, trying to misdirect your attention much the same as a magic trick seeks to do.[9] Basically, this technique relies on cognitive processing errors, turning assumptions upside down, and word confusion. For example: "What happens to liars when they die?" Answer - "They lie still." This joke works because you have to interpret the joke in two ways, and the brain is temporarily confused by its inability to draw on usual experience.[10] All of this happens quickly and unconsciously, and humor becomes your brain's "graceful" way of coping with the mixed signals; if you "get" the joke, you'll be laughing.
When writing, you can still use this technique – write something that appears to be headed in one direction but end up somewhere else totally, such as Groucho Marx' clever one-liner, "Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside of a dog, it's too dark to read", or Rodney Dangerfield's line, "My wife met me at the door the other night in a sexy negligee. Unfortunately, she was just coming home." The aim is to keep what's coming up a total surprise![11]
Surprise where it's least expected: On the plus side for you as an improving funny person, it's good to know that the least funny a place is, the easier it becomes to spring the element of humorous surprise (for example, a dour workplace), while it is far harder to maintain the element of surprise where humor is expected (for example, a comedian doing stand-up comedy).[12]
Timing: Apt timing is as important as surprise, because if you give the brain too much time to work out a situation or joke, the funny moment will pass by. This is probably why jokes people have heard before don't work, as recognition dulls humor because the brain is already primed by experience.[13] React quickly and strike while the humorous moment exists.
Serious: Much humor derives from very serious events and situations in our daily lives. The sooner you grasp this reality and learn to bend it to your sense of humor, the better! (See below for qualifications on making humor out of "serious" moments!)






Be a little silly sometimes!Think silly: This is about taking serious stuff and being not-so-serious with it. Try to find the funnier, lighthearted side of what you're observing and think like a kid.
Status change: Changing a person's status, or the status of something long held to be true, can be very funny. For example, having a CEO of a company ask the receptionist for advice on how to run the company. Or, as Stephen Colbert did, taking a tried and true saying such as "Be the change you want to see in the world" and telling people "[P]lease don’t do that. Some of us like it the way it is. Personally, things are going great for me right now.”[14] can be very amusing.
Know your audience: Have a reasonable idea of what those around you find funny. When you're in a group of people you don't know, for example, just listen to what subjects they're talking about and what's making them laugh. Generally the better you know someone, the easier it will be to make them laugh.






Find funny things in everyday lifeBroaden your factual knowledge or joke material. It is much easier to find funny moments in material you know well – your workplace attitudes, your amazing knowledge of 17th century poetry, your familiarity with fishing trips that went wrong, etc. Whatever the material, though, it also needs to resonate with your audience, meaning that your concise ability to deconstruct a 17th century poem might not hit its mark with somebody not familiar with the piece! As a general rule, people who are very focused on one hobby, occupation, or sitcom can be very funny to other people who are also wrapped up in that particular pursuit. When they try to be funny around people who are not "in the loop," however, their humor often falls flat. In other words, they may come off as "geeks" or "nerds." How do you avoid this?
Broaden your horizons so that you are tuned-in regardless of who you're speaking to. If you can find the humor in physics and Paris Hilton, for example, you're well on your way.
Work your smarts. In a way, being funny is simply showing that you are intelligent enough and know enough about something (hopefully a great many things) to find the humorous nuances that others miss.
Be observant. While knowing a lot can increase your capacity for humor, there's no substitute for seeing a lot. In fact, many very knowledgeable people fail to see the humor in things. Look for the humor in everyday situations, and see what others don't.






Use yourself as fodder for the funnies!Be prepared to put your own foibles in the spotlight. Good comedians tend to use themselves as the principal target for humor, presumably because they know their own foibles so well, but also because it is a means by which they show others the warts-and-all side of their personality which instantly connects with our own warts-and-all side. George Bernard Shaw summed it up well when he stated: "When a thing is funny, search it carefully for a hidden truth." We all spend so much time trying to be better people, often trying to smother up unpleasant truths about our appearance/abilities/thoughts, etc., that it's great to use humor to release the tension this brings about, to let out a collective sigh of relief that we're all in this crazy rat race together, all feeling the same inadequacies and all thinking the same thoughts about things that bug us.
Don't take yourself so seriously. Remember the most embarrassing moments in your life so far, the monumental stuff-ups, the times you refused to make changes, the breakdowns in communications that you played a major part in, etc. Instead of seeing their serious, reputation-wounding side, start seeing what was funny about these moments and how you can share the funny side of it with others. Being able to laugh at yourself in a healthy, non-defensive way is good for you.
Be self-deprecating and humble. These traits can make you appear approachable and when you're being funny, it shows other people that you're like them, you've been through the same trials they have, and that you're a "regular" person. Just make sure to play down the right things in your life though, and not make yourself appear self-destructive or low in self-esteem - these do not make you seem funny but pitiable, and sometimes, pathetic. If you think your humor is self-mortifying, then it's not funny but painful for your listeners – and you.[15]
Be an active listener (and therefore lifelong learner). Listen carefully to others and really hear them, and understand what they're about. When you're busy focused on people other than yourself, you'll get a better sense of how to help others through humor, and it will also enable you to observe and relate the small joys of life too – making your funny self more believable and empathetic.
Be prepared to make daily adjustments to your perspectives of the world and of other people. Your own leaps of faith and changes of heart can be very warming tales of saving face through humor for others to learn from.






Reading humor can improve your humor!Learn from funny people. This is a delightful part of seeking to be a funnier person – you get to watch comedians! Whether they're professional comedians, your parents, your kids, or your boss, learning from the funny people in your life is a key step to being funny yourself. Watch the methods that they use and see what you can adapt to your own situation and personality. Keep a note of some of the funnier things these people say or do. And find what you admire most in these people – even if all you do is cobble together your own funny plan based on one admired trait from each person, you'll be improving your sense of funny tremendously. Immersing yourself like this will help you to develop a toolbox of techniques you can use to be funny:
Read funny books, comics, poems, etc. Read works by people like James Thurber, P.G. Wodehouse, Stephen Fry, Kaz Cooke, Marian Keyes, Woody Allen, Zadie Smith, Bill Bryson, Bill Watterson, Douglas Adams, etc. – and don't forget children's books by good authors; they can be a terrific source of good humor! There are many excellent authors writing funny literature – do a search online for lists of humorous authors, or check out the authors in book stores.
Read joke books. It can't hurt to have a few good memorized jokes up your sleeve; and reading jokes can inspire you to start making up your own witticisms. When reading them, try to dissect the elements that make them such good jokes. Equally, try to work out why some jokes do not work and you'll be learning what to avoid!
Read one-liners. One liners can steal the show. Dorothy Parker was brilliant with one-liners; for example, when told that Calvin Coolidge had died, she replied: "How can they tell?". You need quick wit and readiness for delivering good one-liners but studying other people's can inspire your own.
One liners can be an excellent means for opening and sustaining a dry presentation – for example, stating "If we are what we eat, most of us are in danger of becoming French fries", before proceeding to talk about dry nutritional figures can set the audience at ease that you're funny underneath all those stats.[16]
Watch funny shows. There are so many TV shows and movies with excellent comedians. Just do yourself a favor and watch them, lots!
Read speeches by good comedians or people who have a wonderful sense of humor. Note the ways in which they move or involve the audience using humor, even for serious topics.
Watch improvisers. All good comedians are improvisers but some people choose to improvise for a living and the experience can be hilarious! Attend an improvisation performance and take part in it as much as you can – you'll laugh a lot and observe exactly how they take instant unknown situations and turn them into something very funny.






Being funny can help with learningFocus on the benefits of being funny. From a motivational point of view, as you travel along the path to becoming funnier, it is helpful to understand the extensive benefits of being a funny person. There are benefits both for yourself, and to bestow on those amused by your humor:
Being funny can break down barriers between people and cause us to bond. Laughter itself is considered to be a "universal language".[17] Steve Allen said that humor acts as a "social lubricant and humanizing agent",[18] giving it an important place during even the most serious of times. For example, during both World Wars, comedians and cartoonists formed an important part of maintaining morale among both troops and citizens.
Humor can energize you and leave you feeling a lot more alert. It's like a "mind-break" without having to travel.
Being funny can make you seem a lot less scary. Have you ever experienced a moment where you've frightened a small child but you've quickly turned the situation around by telling a joke, or making fun of your scary height or appearance? It's a natural reaction when we want to make ourselves seem less frightening to others.
Humor can reduce anxiety. Using humor before an exam, test, presentation to the board, etc., is the ideal way to defuse tension and reduce anxiety levels.
Laughter can relieve pain. Numerous studies attest to the ability of laughter to relieve serious pain and illness for defined periods of time.[19] Being funny when you visit a friend in hospital can be a breath of fresh air for them.
Being funny can help people to learn. Whenever you're in a position to teach people, using humor can be a fantastic tool for easing the learning process. Defusing anxiety in a classroom or workplace so that those learning are more receptive to what is being taught is an age-old tradition that works.[20]
Being funny can boost creativity. David M Ogilvy recognized this when he said: "The best ideas come as jokes. Make your thinking as funny as possible." Use humor to solve problems creatively.






A little fun at work livens things upSee being funny as a positive way up the corporate ladder. Peter Ustinov made a very insightful comment that "comedy is simply a funny way of being serious." Having a humorous side at work is beneficial for you and understanding this can help overcome any reservations you might feel about not being taken seriously if you're funny. In fact, if you're known as a good worker and funny, you'll be the person others want to spend time around. Being funny at work can help build teams and relieve workplace stress. In addition, funny people tend to be creative thinkers, intent on keeping an open mind about work challenges, as well as seeking new ways to fix them.[21]
Give a thought to being a funny leader. A leader who loosens up allows the team to loosen up too. If you're in a leadership or management role, set a tone that encourages good humor around the workplace and encourages fun to be a part of workplace life. Find out from your employees what their idea of fun is and start to build relationships of trust based on allowing fun into the workplace.
Consider creating fun ways of tackling hard problems. Taking difficult work situations and turning them into funny ones might seem frivolous at first but it can be an amazing way to turn around a bad situation. For example, a team suffering from low morale can be bolstered by adding humor to the solution, as occurred when a Pennsylvanian bank started a "Worst Customer of the Week" award, complete with champagne given to the employee who told the worst tale of customer behavior each week. This resulted in every teller going out of their way to serve the difficult customers![22]






Humor about the serious stuff needs careful treatment - know the context well!Know when not to be funny. Steve Allen noted that anything could be dealt with humorously, including religion, death, cancer, oppression, etc., but he stressed that this doesn't make it socially appropriate to do so.[23] Getting the balance right is important when you're trying to be funny; there are times when being humorous about something solemn or tragic will fall flat and insult people. Rely on your common sense and the fact that your least favorite member of the family is starting to glare at you with deep malice.
Assess and know your audience before treading forth. If they're likely to take a dim view of your humor under any circumstances, know this beforehand!
Do the "how would I feel?" test. Will Rogers once said: "Everything is funny as long as it is happening to Somebody Else." Would it be so funny if you were the target of the humor? This is aside from the fact that all good humorists should be able to laugh at themselves – know the difference between good, healthy humor and poor taste, or hurtful insults.
Be extremely careful about cracking jokes or pulling pranks in the following situations: workplace, funerals and weddings, places of worship (or religious events), whenever your humor could be mistaken for harassment or discrimination, or if your humor might physically harm somebody (for example, a prank).






Not all funny stuff hits the target - swallow your embarrassment and try again!Spring back. Every well-rounded, self-confident funny person knows how to take a failed funny – forgive yourself. Sometimes a joke will fall flat, or an observation that cracks you up will just make others groan. Don't be discouraged. Learn from your comedic errors, and keep trying. Even the highest paid comedians don't always get a laugh, and no one expects anybody to be funny all the time. If you feel like you're temporarily off your game, just don't try to force humor.

Video

Tips
Gender matters. Men tend to tell more jokes, tease and disparage (hostile humor), and enjoy slapstick humor, whereas women tend to prefer telling a story, usually in a self-deprecating manner, that elicits a response of group solidarity from other females. [24] Interestingly, the roles reverse when you stick men and women together – men tend to tone down the teasing while women turn it up and target it at men, losing much of their self-deprecation in the process![25]
Remember to include non-verbal funny cues, such as doing a funny dance, or making a funny noise, where these are appropriate.
Keep it fresh: staying on one subject can grow tiresome quickly; learn to flip to new topics to keep your humor fresh during an occasion of repartee!
Practice callbacks. You may have noticed that many comedians will tell a joke and then bring it back in one version or another, usually getting as big a laugh (or bigger) on the second time than on the first. This is called a callback, and you can use this technique, too. If you come up with a joke or observation that gets a big laugh, subtly bring it back a little later. As a general rule, though, don't try to call something back more than 3 times.
Fake it till you make it. This adage counts for being funny as much as for confidence. You can smile even when you don't feel like it, and the result is an improvement in mood.[26] Try being funny too, even when you don't feel like it; you'll notice an appreciable improvement in your mood!
Practice being funny. Everything improves with practice but it's important to practice in a low-risk environment first and to build up your funnier self to wider audiences as you improve. Your family and friends will be most forgiving, while your staff will be apprehensive if you're suddenly shape-shifting into a funnier person, and a large audience will expect you to be good from the start. Practicing with people you trust and who can give you constructive feedback is a good way to start.
The use of sarcasm needs to be treated with kid gloves. If you're good with the deadpan delivery and humorous cutting remark, by all means go for it; but for most mere mortals, many a sarcastic comment falls very, very flat and is not at all amusing!
Did you know that laughter is not dependent on sight or sound? Those born deaf and blind know how to laugh instinctively.[27]

Warnings
Some people will always take themselves overly seriously – while they're riper for being a source of humor than anyone else, on the whole, it pays to not over-target them. All the same, don't let their arrogance, insecurities, or stubborn attachment to solemnity bring you down. Recognize that terribly serious people can be very difficult to work and live with, and keep a good distance from them if your humor is rubbing them the wrong way. Alternately, if you're a strong enough person, don't give in and be the perennial funny thorn in their side!
Don't try too hard. The harder you try, the more serious it gets, and the less fun it is. Let down your defenses and be receptive to whatever may come.
Be very careful with being funny about sacred cows, from religion to politics. Everything can be funny but sometimes if you go "too far" in someone else's eyes, they'll call you on it. Be ready for that, and be armed with your reasons. All the same, keep in mind that not all calls on you for "insulting" someone or "beliefs" are good calls – sometimes your humor will have a touched a raw nerve that deserved to be exposed – remember that humor often exposes truth.
Don't laugh at your own jokes until everyone else is laughing. It will not only make it seem you're trying too hard to be funny, but it can also spoil the funny moment and nobody else will feel inclined to laugh. Avoid "canned laughter" for individuals.
Don't repeat jokes. If you think your friends might have heard it before, find something else to be funny about.
Avoid overloading people with jokes or funny quips. Sometimes you can overdo a good thing.
Don't linger over people who don't get your sense of humor. They might be attuned differently because of culture, gender, interests, etc., and you're marching to a different beat. Just respect it for what it is – a difference of humor!
If you wait too long, even very funny comments will lose their impact. For example, if someone says something to you and you think of a witty comeback two hours later, you're probably better off just keeping it to yourself. It won't be funny anymore, and you'll look slow, and possibly daft.
What is funny has cultural overlays. Something funny in the USA may be perplexing in France, for example. Keep this in mind, and try to find universally shared funny stories.
Read More
Posted on
Facebook is an amazing success as a social network. Anyone who can get 500 million people to connect, share photos, and click on little cows in Farmville deserves major kudos.

But the bullshit monopoly-money valuation merry-go-round has to stop. It’s getting beyond ridiculous and when even serious publications like Forbes jump on for a ride. It’s time to take deep breath and take a look at reality.

Minority investment valuations aren’t real Facebook is now supposedly worth $33,000,000,000, but that number is entirely based on what star-struck minority investors have paid for a tiny slice of the company.

The company has supposedly taken just under a billion dollars in venture capital and small secondary-market sales of stock. So the actual money that has changed hands is just 3% of the total valuation of the company!

In other words, the valuation is resting on the flawed assumption that Facebook could actually ever get 33 times as much money to change hands if they wanted to. There’s just no way, no how that’s happening right now. If it could, they’d IPO tomorrow.

So the Facebook valuation based on minority investments is in my mind a complete joke in the sense that there was $33,000,000,000 dollars on the table. Irrational investor exuberance indeed.

You’re only worth something if you can make money to keep If you boil it down to what valuations really should be about, discounted future cash flow, it gets completely bizarro-world funny. The rumor is that Facebook will be generating a billion dollars in revenue. That’s certainly real money, right?

Wrong. Real money is what’s left over after you pay your expenses. If the supposed billion dollars Facebook is allegedly pulling in this year was happening at anywhere a decent margin, they wouldn’t have needed a series E round of $120 million from Elevation Partners just three months ago.

But let’s be charitable. Let’s imagine that Facebook miraculously made $200 million this year — a 20% margin. (I don’t think that’s true, otherwise why take another $120 million from Elevation Partners, but hey, let your imagination roam). That would put Facebook’s P/E at some 165.

That’s about 7.5 times as much as Google, the golden cash cow of the internet world. Would you seriously think that Facebook is 7.5 times as good or as promising a business as Google? Get outta here.

No outrageous profits after seven years and half a billion users Oh, well, but maybe Facebook just needs to mature, you say. If we give them just a few more years, the profit fairy might drop by and sprinkle her billions all over Facebook and its shareholders. I call fat chance.

Facebook has been around for seven years. It has 500 million users. If you can’t figure out how to make money off half a billion people in seven years, I’m going to go out on a limb and say you’re unlikely to ever do.

Now this was all fun and games until somebody promised the Newark schools $100 million in stock based on the fantasy valuation of his under-profiting company. But now it’s real. They’re selling the skin before they shot the bear or peeing their pants to get to the hut or whatever you want to call it. It’s just not good, alright?
Read More
Posted on
Maybe it's a significant other, friend, or other person you regularly see or spend time with but you're unsure if your relationship or friendship with them is for the right reasons, or whether it's just because you're feeling lonely. If you feel that this applies to you, here are some steps for figuring out whether or not you genuinely like spending time with this person or only do so because you don't want to be lonely.

Steps


Question your initial motives for choosing to know this person. At the start, maybe you were genuinely interested in this person's qualities or had something in common with them when you first met. On the other hand, maybe you felt you should be nice to them just because your other friends liked them, or you were on the rebound from a break-up, or something in the other person's life made you feel sorry for them. Try to go back to the start of your relationship and think of as many different reasons as you can for why you became involved with them. Doing this will help you to decide how you truly feel towards this person.



Consider how you usually feel in this person's company. Think about what you personally gain from the experience of spending time with this person. Do you get bored, feel anxious, or uncomfortable? On the other hand, perhaps you often feel happy, cheerful, loving, or warm when spending time with them. Take some time to think through as many different memories as you can to build up a pattern – have you experienced enjoyable times or is it hard to even remember the last time you experienced any positive feelings around them – if ever?



Give yourself some space. This step may be difficult for you if you really dislike being alone but it is important to try. Being apart from the person about whom you're not sure can give you a clearer perspective on whether or not it's purely loneliness that motivates you to keep communicating with this person, or whether there are genuinely good reasons for staying connected. Try to remain apart for at least two weeks; this amount of time will help you figure out whether or not you really miss the person in question, or whether you're just bored when they're not around. While apart, consider whether:
You miss specific things about them. If so, it's probable that you genuinely care for this person.
You find it hard to recall anything in particular that you're missing, or there is only a vague sense of missing their company. You might even feel a sense of relief that you're not having to "put up" with certain behaviors and attitudes this person has when you're together. In this case, it's possible that you're only keeping this person in your life to fill a gap.
You find yourself making comparisons with ex-friends or ex-dates in your life. Some time apart can sometimes reveal a negative pattern of similar issues, personality traits, and habits arising. In this case, you have probably made the same error again, repeating a relationship that is unlikely to fulfil either of you.
Give yourself time for self-reflection and self-discovery. If you don't know yourself very well, you're vulnerable to seeking affirmation of your worth in relationships with others and are under the spell of expecting others to "raise you from the ground up". If you feel that this is what you've been doing, allow yourself time to figure out who you are and what you care about so that you can grow to like yourself more. In doing so, you'll replace feelings of loneliness with liking yourself, creating a strong foundation for healthy relationships with other people.



Maybe you've been expecting too much of this person?Ask yourself if your expectations for the relationship are too high. Sometimes you might question whether you want someone in your life because you constantly butt heads with them. But it might not be that you actually dislike this person. It could simply be that you like them well enough, but that there are habits or personality traits of theirs you find it hard to relate to or handle over any extended period of time, indicating that you're just not all that close or that when you're together, it needs to be only in "small doses". For example, it could be because they're an introvert while you're an extrovert. Or, maybe their interests don't coincide that much with yours but they insist on telling you all about theirs while not returning you the same courtesy of listening about yours. If you're thinking by this point "yes, that's exactly it!", this is likely to be a sign that you'd benefit by spending more time with other people – as well as still some (perhaps less) time with this person – rather than a sign you dislike this person and only spend time with them to avoid being alone.


Spend time with other peopleExpose yourself to as many other people as you feel you can. Spending time with other people might give you a better idea of the kinds of people you'd prefer to know. Seeing other people in different contexts might help to give you an idea of whether or not the person you've been spending a lot of time with fits into this category, or whether you might have outgrown them.
If you're feeling nervous about spending time with other people (especially if your time has greatly revolved around this one person), trying out this step doesn't have to mean spending time with family or close friends (though these things do help) only. Just saying a cheerful "hi" or seeking to make small talk with a few acquaintances (whether it be a shop assistant, colleague, or someone you regularly pass in the street) can be a start.
If you've allowed this person to take over a lot of your life and shut you off from other people, you might like to consider volunteering with people who are feeling lonely, such as senior citizens, or down and out youth. This will help to put your own feelings of loneliness into perspective and will bring into contact with many other people, thinking of their needs rather of your own neediness.
If you feel bad about spreading your wings, see this as an altruistic act. Your spending time with a wider range of people can help break the loneliness cycle not just for you, but for the other person; a recent study undertaken by the University of Chicago, the University of California-San Diego and Harvard found that loneliness is contagious and can be passed on to others, meaning that you could transmit your loneliness to this person without even meaning to do so.[1] In increasing your exposure to other people, you may be breaking the cycle of loneliness for both of you.


How do you really feel around them?Monitor your ongoing thoughts and emotions. Another approach you can use to test the relationship's value to you is by making plans to do something with this person and following through with the plans. All the while you are carrying out this plan, monitor your automatic thoughts and emotional reactions. If, prior to and during this time, you find your head is full of negative thoughts such as "This is going to be awful," or "I wish I had something nicer/more interesting/better to do," or you experience strong negative emotions such as dread, disgust, boredom, etc., then these are likely warning signs that you don't truly like being with or appreciate this person as someone who connects with you.


End the friendship or relationship if appropriate. If you feel after trying these steps that you truly don't like this person, and only see them to avoid being alone, consider ending the relationship and finding other people or activities to fill your time. Not only will this bring relief to you but doing this will be fairer on the other person rather than dragging out the lackluster relationship any longer. Accept that sometimes we have to let go in order to grow.
Read More
Posted on
Knowing how to invert colors on Windows 7 is useful for improving your reading experience according to personal preference. Doing this can enable you to change the appearance of Windows 7 on your computer screen so that it might be easier to read online. Or, just for fun, you may simply be keen to see how your computer looks when the colors have been inverted. This article explains what to do to invert the colors on Windows 7.

Steps
Click on the "Start" menu. Type "Magnifier" in the search box. Click on the magnifier application to open it.
When the magnifier application opens, your screen will be zoomed in. Click the negative button (-) until you're zoomed out all the way.



Once you're zoomed out, click on the gray gear to open the "Preferences". Put a check in the box that says "Turn on color inversion". Then click "OK". Your screen colors should now be inverted!


The options for the magnifier do not change if you leave the application so you will only need to do this once.



Example of inverted white screen to black Right click on the magnifier application on the task bar. Click "Pin to taskbar" you'll now be able to invert your screen colors with one click of the mouse. Just right click and choose "close window" to un-invert the colors and click the icon once to invert. Enjoy your inverted screen colors!
A typical end result will enable you to read a document online with a black background rather than a white one, with the text changing to white. This can be a lot easier on some people's eyes when reading PDFs, emails, long textual documents, and even Facebook.

Video

Things You'll Need
Windows 7
Read More
Posted on Tuesday, 5 October 2010
Steps
1
Don't care so much about what others think of you. We will always, on some level, be concerned with others' opinions of ourselves, but realize that ultimately, you will never be able to please everyone. Try hard, but don't be so concerned with judging yourself or being judged by others. People have millions of ways to get under your skin. Learn to spot them and become immune. Be happy with yourself and do what you enjoy.

Ads by Google
Brain Test™ Developed by Neuroscientists Improve Memory and Attention
www.lumosity.com
2
Be aware of how others will perceive you. This might seem to contradict the previous step, but there's a difference in letting people's judgments affect your self esteem, and being aware of how you come off to others. What you are really doing is being aware of how you look from another person's perspective. In terms of physical appearance: beware of food getting stuck in your teeth, bad breath, body odor, toilet paper stuck to your shoe, etc. In terms of composure: try not to stare too much (it makes people uncomfortable), stand/sit up straight (it makes you look and feel more confident), smile generously, be polite and considerate, etc. Definitely be aware of your body language at all times; analyzing body language can be a useful tool in knowing how to present yourself.
3
Present yourself in a positive way. Walk with good posture and look people in the eye. If you slump or stare at your feet, people won't respect you. You have to look and feel confident in order to receive the respect you need.
4
Find real friends. For example, if people don't hang out with you because you don't wear designer clothes, they are not real friends. Instead, find friends that see you for who you are. If the people standing in front of you can't see you for you, then how can they be your friend?
5
Don't be afraid to be different, whether that means standing up for yourself, defending someone else, or taking interest in something that no one else does, like playing an instrument. The coolest people are the ones who occasionally break against the tide and make people question the status quo. Insecure people will, at times, become jealous of you. These people will try to get to you, in an attempt to take the attention off of you and bestow it upon themselves. The important thing to remember is not to smile in weakness, just ignore them. Not as if you didn't hear your antagonist, but casually and conversationally disregard their remarks.
6
Speak up. Observe people who are "cool"--they usually speak confidently and clearly, at a good pace. They don't chatter rapidly, pause, or mumble. They say what they mean, and mean what they say. Be confident in your word and don't let anyone try to change it. If you state your opinion and people disagree, don't worry. You said what you felt and people will respect you for that, unless you use it knowing it will offend someone. However, make it count. Don't shout out your opinion just to be heard. Make sure it's relevant, and be ready to back it up soundly.
7
Learn how to laugh at yourself. Being cool doesn't mean being perfect, and being able to find humor in your moments of clumsiness and discomfort is the defining hallmark of being cool. People will not only respect you for it, but they'll like you for being human, just like them.
8
Write a list of all of the goals you are aiming for. What essentially makes you cool is your identity. Try to find your talent -- sports, music, art, whatever. People will notice your passion and respect you for it. You can also learn new skills and meet new people by trying new things.
9
Take a deep breath. Being cool is all about being relaxed and comfortable in any circumstance. Don't lose your cool. If you feel yourself about to lose your temper, or burst into tears, or lose control in any way, take a deep breath and excuse yourself. Stay calm. Don't be disruptive, annoying, or have unpredictable mood changes. You are serene and steadfast in your coolness and it should show. That means not getting too caught up in anything, not even your cool self.
10
Be friendly, but not excessively eager. Everyone loves someone who is outgoing, but nobody likes someone who is overly excited. Many people find someone who is overeager to be annoying. Try not to force yourself on people. Smile and strike up a conversation, but make sure you know the line between friendly and obsessive.
11
Use appropriate language. Don't use bad language and stick to your morals.
12
Be a good conversationalist. Everyone loves someone who knows what to say at the right moment. Most of the time, it is much better to be sort of quiet and analyze the conversation, enjoying the humor of your friends. Then wait for the right moment to make a comment, usually to great result. However, if you come up into the middle of a quiet group of people, it is better to take a Tony Stark approach. Be playful! Joke around with them. Making fun of people is fine, but make sure that you know the limits on it and that the people you're around are the kind of people who know you're kidding.
13
Dress how you want. As long as your personality shines through, you can wear whatever you like. Guys have been known to get girlfriends even though they wear sweats all the time. That is definitely an affirmation of coolness. Being cool despite wearing something people generally make fun of.
14
Refrain from using too many colloquialisms. This may make you appear as "fake" or unable to grasp your respected language. Speak normally, clearly and confidently (see #6) and if you feel it is necessary adopt a more formal register and use polysyllabic words. However do not go overboard as this may make you appear pretentious, this being just as bad as seeming fake. Finding the right balance in your speech is important to making you seem intelligent and somewhat sophisticated in the presence of your peers.
15
Keep your "cool". The very definition of cool is being calm, composed, under control, not excited, indifferent, and socially adept. Many times, cool people are those that don't get excited about things, that don't always have to talk, unless they have something cool to say. Learn how to deal with people. Don't get angry or frustrated. Being cool is natural. It's easy to do. Often times, the people who strive the hardest for coolness are sabotaging themselves by trying too hard. People like people that don't try, but are still successful. How does that work? One of the secrets of being cool is that, when one is just between trying and not trying at all, things just fall into place. Be confident.
16
Be yourself. Don't try to be like anyone else. Live life for who you are. Don't lose sight of yourself or your morals. Being cool isn't about changing who you are, its about being confident enough to let people see how awesome you really are.
17
Feel good about yourself. You may want to fit in and be cool at the moment, but later will you feel good about it? These are questions you need to ask yourself before making a decision. Just because you look cool, doesn't mean you will feel good later. You can still fit in and feel okay later on. I promise. Know that being cool doesn't necessarily mean you'll be with the "in" crowd. Everyone has their crowd, just make sure you like yours and you'll be fine.
18
Don't use bad behavior to get attention. There are many young people that take up smoking, drinking, bullying, and other bad habits. Why? Most often, this comes from negative reinforcement. After doing something bad, a person may be "rewarded" with attention. "I can't believe he did that!" people will say. It is easy to misinterpret attention as popularity, even if it's for doing something wrong. If you want to be cool, you need to know your limits. You should never substitute negative attention for really being cool. Most of the time, the people who have bragging competitions about law-breaking and bonging beer do not fit into the category of cool. If a group of people doesn't like you for who you are and the lifestyle you've chosen, move on.
19
Never Argue. When you're cool, arguing is always canceled. You realize winning an argument is pointless. When you know you're right you just know it. You don't need to waste time effort and energy attempting to persuade someone who hasn't seen the things you have seen.
Read More
Posted on Thursday, 23 September 2010









The Twilight Saga New Moon Eclipse Breaking Dawn

I wonder what would motivate such an outlandish column. It's as if this writer had no other / better ideas, and decided, "Hey, the Twilight Saga New Moon Eclipse Breaking Dawn is really hot right now! I'll bet if I can think of something to write that Involves Twilight, at least people will read it. "Well, think of another way to get people to read your columns! If you had read one single word of the Twilight Saga, you would understand that the entire point of Bella and Edward's relationship is quite the opposite of abusive. Bella loves Edward so much, he would sacrifice his feelings and his well being to let her experience anything and everything in this world. He wants her to go to college. (Both of the last 2 books discuss this in depth - even mentioning the fact that the graduates with outstanding SAT scores, good grades, and acceptance into many universities) Edward Bella would never abused in any way, and wishes for her to find a human lover, have a normal life, and experience things that she will never be able to experience if she remains with him. Furthermore, Bella is to 17/18 year old girl in these books. What percentage of girls this age - and even guys - rush / fall / dive into the arms of another potential boyfriend / girlfriend to start feeling better after suffering a break up? Just because she ends up spending a lot of time and developing feelings for Jacob, that does not mean that she MUST have a boyfriend to be happy, or that she can rescue herself. It does not give us any idea of how she may have ended up as an adult woman if she would not have followed this particular path. It's just representing a very typical way that an adolescent girl - or boy - break up and handles heart break. I really do not believe that even this writer believes any of these inane concepts that she discusses in her column. There is clearly a different motivation. It seems as if this piece was only written to spark controversy / debate, and rile people up. Not one single sentence in this column is relevant or believable. I am getting really upset with the sheer number of writers who are choosing to write about Twilight New Moon Eclipse Breaking Dawn garbage pieces and find an angle that they can relate to Twilight New Moon Eclipse Breaking Dawn simply because it's the only way that they can get anybody to read their column. I direct this next sentence to all writers. If you are going to write about Twilight just to actually Obtain some readers, please, at the very least, write something that is relevant, believable, truthful, and accurate. Do not try to play devil's advocate or find absurdly negative angles that will spark controversy. We can see right through it!

watch twilight eclipse breaking dwan full movie online free
Bella basically saves everyone she loves in the end of Twilight Breaking Dawn, that instead of being weak she becomes the most powerful vampire in the coven? And how is it bad that she stands for her principles of wanting to keep her baby? Just because she's young does not mean she should have given it up. I thought the whole pro-choice movement was about CHOICE. Not that if you're under a Certain age you must get an abortion because it's considered responsible. She was married and had the means to raise a child and most importantly, she loved the baby, even if it meant giving up her own life. The moral of self-sacrifice is huge in the Harry Potter books, but no one has a problem with that. It's only if a woman is self-sacrificing is it against feminist law. Unfortunately I do not think the writer has done enough research on this issue. Actually, Bella does not need protection, as the series progresses you find her protecting everyone from the volturi and amazingly she's had the power to do that all along, she just had to tune into it. I think that's a beautiful thing to teach young girls, and any woman! We are constantly doubting ourselves. It's nice to have a story where the men are manly, take care of you when need be, but in the end us chicks can kick some bootie and take some names! This article is ridiculous and just wasted about 90 seconds of my life. If you just want to write or publish something, find a different topic. I believe everyone has their right to their opinion, but still based on some type of merit. This article is without merit and by the sounds of it I really do not think you've paid any attention to the books. I have to wonder if there would be so much question about Bella being a weak character if she had wanted an abortion and Edward had wanted her to have the child? I am a bit disturbed by the people who think that wanting to have her child means she sets women back fifty years. I thought the point was that it was the woman's CHOICE. Whether you agree with her choice or not, it is still hers to make and I do not think it makes her any weaker Because she wanted to take the risks. I felt that Edward's response was a good one ... I was Concerned for her health above all else. Ultimately it was her choice, though, and she had a right to make it. It's a bit ironic for a woman to say that we have the right to make the decision, but only if you agree with me does that choice have any validity. The complaint seems to be that Edward controls Bella life, but then when she disagrees with him, you seem to be saying that she should have done what he wanted her to do. You can not have it both ways. It's good that Bella had the choice to have the child. However, the growth-accelerated, half-vampire, mutant death baby was killing her and both her spine snapped and bit her abdomen open during birth. Stephenie Meyer, in writing this portion of the book, is saying that women must keep their babies even if the pregnancy kills them. That's why I have issues with this concept. They must not have read Midnight Sun on Stephenie Meyer's website where it tells the story from Edward's POV. If you think Bella's up's and down's revolve around Edward, you should think about Edward. His life revolved around is WAY MORE than anything Bella! He is willing to love and protect her but also willing to give her up Because he thinks he is Harming her. He lives for her but will not do so if she's gone. IT'S MUTUAL! I pity all these retards that can not figure out that this story is just another modern day Romeo and Juliet. Twilight New Moon Eclipse Breaking Dawn are literary fiction and the writer is reading WAY TOO MUCH INTO THIS. Heck, Which Cinderella mother has not read or told stories similar to her child? Which mother has not let her child watch stories where two people fall in love and have a happy ending? From the time we r babies, girls are taught to believe in prince charming. Taught to play w / dolls, kitchens, dress-up, etc. princess and told stories. If feminist out there think Twilight New Moon Eclipse Breaking Dawn is wrong then I hope to God that you start teaching your child when they r babies not to like anything feminine or anything that could be construe as weak. There is absolutely nothing wrong with depending on men Because they depend on us, too. It's called teamwork and to think otherwise is pure ignorance and stupid. Actually, I think you are reading into Bella's ecisions to get the story that you want to write. On many occasions, SPOILER ALERT, mainly Bella's pregnancy, she chooses to have the baby, even though Edward clearly would rather have her abort instead of risking her health. You need to remember that this story is fiction, and for the greater part of the four books, Bella is human - it would make no sense for her vampire boyfriend and werewolf best friend NOT to save her when she was in trouble. I'm all for feminism and empowered, strong women yet I do not think this argument is valid in any way.
As a teacher of literature, I ask you to look at the evolution of Bella as a whole character ... do not just pull out snippets of different books and make judgments based on those incidents. As a character, Bella evolves. She is COMPLETELY different in "Breaking Dawn" than she was in "Twilight", hence the symbolism of the queen at the front of the chessboard on the book cover. In the end, it is Bella who saves her entire family and many others. She fights to keep her child when others are not so keen on her carrying it to term. She fights for what she wants, namely Edward and a COMPLETE family (remember, Bella comes from a broken home-the Cullens, along with Charlie and Renee, make her feel part of a whole family. Look at the Evolution of Beauty, not just bits and pieces. If you do, you will realize that, at the end, she is the one in control and the one who is willing to sacrifice herself to save those she loves. Sorry - to clarify - I think and hope that adult women know it is NOT a healthy kind of love to do all the things Bella did to keep Edward and then have him return to her, and also that a girl should not treat a boy like Jacob the way she treats him. Preteens and many teenagers do not have the ability to recognize this is not healthy and is not the kind of love that goes anywhere good. I think a lot of people are missing the point of these Twilight New Moon Eclipse Breaking Dawn books. I am in my late 30's, so I no longer deal with teen agnst but I like to watch Twilight Eclipse full movie online free anyway. However, I did enjoy the books, and I feel that girls and women connect with them and the character of Edward Because he represents an era long gone: chivalry. He opens doors for her car. He takes her on trips. He cares about her well-being. You just do not find that these days with these stupid men that we are faced with. They are more Concerned with having the next hottie on their arm than actually treating her right. I also want to Reiterate what another poster said: These Twilight New Moon Eclipse Breaking Dawn books are fiction! Anyone who actually believes they can have a baby that's a half-breed of vampire and human is detached from reality anyway. It's a fantasy, folks. Enjoy it and quit whining. I think people need to remember that these books are about vampires! Vampires are make believe, people! As are men who change into wolves! I think everyone should stop reading into whether or not the relationship is abusive (of COURSE Edward wants to kill Bella - he survives on BLOOD!) Or Whether Bella is a "strong female character that young women should model themselves after" (let's remember she's Literary dating an evil monster who can read minds) and read it for what it is ... a Fantasy story! If anyone reading these books are shaping themselves after the characters in them, they have much bigger issues than having low self-worth. OK I get that. But Edward and Bella can not be the only relationship they "see" and Therefore if they think that this is the only way to be in love, then the adults in their lives, the REAL people, are not doing their jobs! They are not making the distinction between FANTASY and REALITY clear enough. I understand how young girls can be naive, I was Young Once too, but come on! Books and movies found in the Sci / Fi-Fantasy section of the video and book stores are CLEARY things that should not be taken as gospel Because by definition they are NOT REAL! Make Believe! So, my point is that if the story is not real, then why should the relationship be used IN the story as an example of how to live REAL life? If young girls believe that they want a realtionship like Edward and Bella's then, again, the adults in their lives should clarify the difference between make believe and reality for them. Also, let's remember how fickle tweens can be. "The Twilight Saga New Moon Eclipse Breaking Dawn" is the fad now, but fads change and those "tweens" will be onto the next thing Deems the pop culture "in" thing next week! I agree that Bella is not exactly the best female role model to hit the shelves books lately, but who says she has to be. Not every woman is strong willed, independent and out to conquer the world, just like not every man is is Superman. What is wrong with a story where a woman needs a man to feel complete - not that part of what being in a relationship is about? Side note: I read all four books and thought they were OK, not award winning or anything, but a nice quick read.

watch twilight eclipse breaking dwan full movie online free
Seriously if any one has read the books you would know that Bella plans on going to Dartmoth with Edward and that it is all Bella's idea to become a vampire not Edwards they make a very twisted web of compromises to finially end up where they do. To the feminist who wrote this artical. Would you rather teach young women to go out and have premarital sex and get pregnant or have a stable life with someone then have children to be married. Stephanie Meyer's books have morality Which is lacking in our Society today. If you dont like the Twilight New Moon Eclipse Breaking Dawn books or the movie thats fine you are entitled to your opinion, but before you can make a proper opinion you need to read the Twilight New Moon Eclipse Breaking Dawn books most likely in your case more than once so you can get the details right. Most of all it is fiction. Not Real. I dont see that you have an opinion on classics like Wuthering Heights and Romeo and Juliet. Talk about your Abusive relationships. Maybe if you acutally read a little before you comment your opinions might be acutually acurate. Except Romeo and Juliet and Wuthering Heights end in tragedy - Thereby sending the message that such blind love is destructive. Bella and Edward end up happily ever after - not the same at all. Finally, everyone talks about morality lacking in society today-when did society have it? in the 1950s, when lynching was acceptable? When women had no choices and it was just fine to beat your wife (as long as it's in the comfort of your own home, after all). When men were free to sexually harass to their heart's content? This is a myth people seem to latch onto today. The only people were better off in 1950s middle / upper class white males. So Stacey, if you want to be oppressed, I agree, let's go back to the good old days of "morality." Maybe you and I have different definitions of morals. Have you ever read the books? Does the rescuing Bella in New Moon, Eclipse, and Breaking Dawn. She remains steadfast in her opinion t keep her baby when EVERYONE else is telling her to have an abortion. She does drive her car in New Moon and the only times she does is when she's been injured. Edward is constantly trying to convince her to go to college before she gets turned. This is the worst article written about this saga I have ever read. You might want to try doing actual research before publishing untrue crap that is only going to fuel the animosity toward this saga. Shame on you and shame on whoever let you publish this. Technically, Jacob rescues Bella multiple times in New Moon, though she does go get Edward. But then, this is what annoyed me, she just takes Edward back. No "I can not believe you left me you a **" ... she just takes him back. I think a stronger girl would make him work for it. And I do not recall anyone saving Bella in Eclipse, Although it's been awhile. My real issue with Bella is that her whole life revolves around Edward, she drops all of her friends and hardly even considers how her family will feel if she turns into a vampire. Obviously, she's just a character in a book and no one will ever face what she does, but I can see where there's some concern. It's fiction people! The reason why my daughter and I (and please note that I am not speaking for ANYONE else) enjoyed the books is that the two heroes of the novel, Edward and Jacob, were larger than life, and would do anything for their love, Bella . We both understood this was fiction, and in fact when I read the books, I had a discussion with my daughter, since she was still too young to date, that Edward was all fantasy. That teenage boys do not in most situations girlfriends put their needs before their own. I was sure to explain that her protection in all things is her own responsibility.
I never cease to be shocked and appalled by the ignorance of those who claim to have read the Twilight New Moon Eclipse Breaking Dawn series and, yet, continue to make such asinine comments. There is no stalking or abuse in the series. While this question might not agree with Bella's decisions, it is Bella, not Edward, who drives the outcome. He begs her to wait, to seek education, and she refuses. Stephenie Meyer loved Bella's character enough that she allowed her the entire human experience in a few short years, from finding and losing love, making the decision to spend her eternity with Edward on her terms, and becoming a mother. She is spared nothing, and her options to continue her life are endless. The functionally illiterate should accept their limitations and save reading for the purposes of understanding to those who can do so with insight and clarity. Here's how I see it. And forgive me if I'm repeating since I did not read all the comments. I simply wanted to respond. Forgetting the fact, for the moment, that I am a firm believer in women being able to care for themselves. I was raised by a strong father who believe it was not only practical, but crucially important that I learn to care for myself in all aspects. He taught me to change the tires on my car, change the oil, balance my checkbook, learn to fix a leaky faucet or toilet, drive a manual transmission as well as thinking independently and taking my future and my needs into my hands - not leaving them up to fate or anyone else. His words were, "Even if you find the perfect man to care for you and who would never abandon you, the world's hars and there's no guarantee he will not be killed in a horrible accident leaving you to fend for yourself. Better be able to do it. "That being said, the point of feminism was not to make women strong. Though that's what it did. The point was to give women the CHOICE to be strong. People believe now that any woman who chooses to marry directly out of high school and let a man care for her is anti-feminist. It's not. It may not be what I believe is smart or practical, but it is her CHOICE and that's the point.
With regard to the Twilight New Moon Eclipse Breaking Dawn books. I agree that it does not Provide what I would like my daughters to learn about life. I would like them to think and choose for themselves. But the Twilight books are not the only example of this issue. Take Disney's Cinderella (girl slaves away in oppression waiting for someone to wave a magic wand to save her and give her a strong handsome prince - without even really knowing him). Do I think that Bella was smart to run off and let Edward do everything for her? No. But she made the CHOICE. Why did not she abort? Because she felt it was the wrong decision for her. She made the CHOICE to carry through with the pregnancy at the cost of her life. And as an aside, a lot of discussion happened with regard to college prior to her becoming a vampire. And actually that was the plan. However, they had plenty more critical things to worry about in the days following her transformation. The Twilight New Moon Eclipse Breaking Dawn books did not continue enough to let us know whether or not she attended college. I personally assume that she does eventually do that when she's ready. With regards to the domestic violence, I agree in many ways. I read the books with my daughter and found that, though I liked the books, I was disturbed in many places that a girl could be so enamored by a man that is obviously a very real danger to her. I do not believe it is healthy in any way. I'm not on "team anything", but Jacob is even more so. At one point he forcefully kisses her against her will and her father sides with Bella making Jacob feel she overreacted. And then she forgives him. Iv seen New moon twice and beautiful does drive her truck eg. when she sees sam cliff diving. what the hell are you talking about???? as for jacob drives her when she has just jumped off the cliff and nearly drowned Sorry if shes not up to driving herself home!! All the Vampires have degrees is Because they hav been around for a hundred years and have to repeat high school and college so of course there going to be smart. Also Edward saves Bella in New Moon did you not see / read the part at the end?? you know where she saves him? If you read eclipse Which it sounds like you havnt edward wants her to go to college and they are both signed up to go at the end. For god sake, like many people have said already its fiction NOT REAL!! Get your facts right before you start writing garbage!

Bella is the Heroine in Twilight New Moon Eclipse Breaking Dawn book four. Hence the cover of Breaking Dawn (BD). She starts off at the beginning as the pawn but by the end of BD she is considered the queen. She ends up saving and protecting EVERYONE she loves and cares for. She is essentially the strongest character at the end of the series. Of course she needs rescuing books throughout 1.3 Because she is a human caught up in the supernatural! Let's not forget these books Involve VAMPIRES AND WEREWOLVES-both have supernatural abilities that humans just do not stand a chance against!! Edward is extremely protective of Bella of course-her life is constantly in danger, partly Because she is so close the supernatural world, other times she is just a klutz. To those who have actually read the books-you'll understand that Bella is a danger magnet pulling anything dangerous w / in a 5 mile radius to her. This theme is present throughout all Twilight series. The same goes for Jacob, while he believes that maybe she needs protecting from Edward himself, it is not b / c he believes Edward to be an abusive person (vampire) but b / c of the vampires pose danger to the humans around them! ! Again w / the supernatural. To add another point-Bella truck drives her throughout the series w / o being driven by Edward and Jacob the entire time. Read the books, that statement is utterly false. Second-Why do all the male vampires have college degrees, medical degrees? For one as you have mentioned "Beauty is just graduating from high school in the 3rd book-a normal 18 year old human girl ... while Edward and Carlisle (who are mentioned as having degrees) have been around a lot longer for a century Edward , Carlisle for a few more. Third-Bella gets married fresh out of high school, with nary a word breathed about higher education? And then, when she becomes pregnant, why does she emphatically refuse an abortion, even though the pregnancy is killing her? (Let me be clear: I'm not saying it's wrong for a woman to choose marriage and motherhood, or wrong for her to decide against college. But Bella is still a kid, even in Breaking Dawn.) Ok this one is a gem -YOU 'RE COMPLETELY WRONG about her not being mentioned higher education. It is discussed throughout the 3rd and 4th book. Bella so badly wants to be a vampire (because she wants Edward forever and also b / c by staying human, she believes she is bringing everyone she loves (her father, mother, and friends) too close to all the things that conspire to take her life (stalking vampire armies, Volutri, etc.).. However (if you read the books you would have understood this) she as well as the rest of the Cullen family believe that when you are a newborn vampire-it's hard to control the "thirst" raging inside you. True to form, Bella would never endager innocent people-who would want to go to a class lecture w / an vampire wildy out of control next to you anyway? Bella is young, but not a kid. She is mature for her years-no ordinary human could stand to be in such close proximity w / vampires and werewolves on a daily basis both good and bad without being able to handle a lot emotinally and physically. Kid or not, Bella proves to be stronger than both Edward and Jake give her credit for-again b / c they are vampires and werewolves. I'm wondering if some of these people have actually read the books, or if they're just jumping to their own conclusions. (A lot more goes on in the books than we see in the movies.) First of all, Edward & Bella do not have an abusive relationship. Does he hit her, yell at her, or put her down? No. I have worries about her, he tries to protect her and do what's best for her, and he tries to make her happy. He does not want her to become a vampire Because he wants her to experience all that life has to offer. They do discuss going to college and she even fills out a bunch of applications. She can get into these colleges Because she's a good student. When the story ends, there's no indication that she will not end up going to college. In fact, I always assumed she would. She'll forever look like an 18 year-old, so she can go to college as many times as she wants. As for her deciding to keep her baby, any mother would willingly give up her life for her child. What's more important than your baby? She's not exhibiting suicidal tendencies. She actually believes that everything will work out somehow. This is all a bunch of nonsense. We're discussing a series about vampires and werewolves! Why are we tearing it apart and acting as if it could be based on reality? If that were the case, what about all of the good examples that are set in these books Twilight New Moon Eclipse Breaking Dawn? None of the teenagers behave like a character out of a CW show. They are not spoiled brats who party all the time, do drugs & have multiple sex partners. And, Bella is clearly not a doormat or a damsel in distress. How many times has she been the one to do the saving? SHE Risk her life to save her mother in "Twilight", she saved Edward's, Alice's & her own bacon in NM, she was willing to sacrifice herself to save everyone in "Eclipse" & was the one who figured out Victoria's plan. In BD, she saves practically everyone in the end. The girl shows how brave she is time and time again. If anything, Edward is always kissing her butt and she's constantly getting her way. I'd much rather my teenage cousins read Twilight New Moon Eclipse Breaking Dawn than a lot of the trash out there. First of all, I know they get that Edward is a vampire and does not really exist and second, they get that Bella is a regular girl among powerful supernatural creatures, who often manages to be braver than any of them.

watch twilight eclipse breaking dwan full movie online free
I would also like to add that though I do not agree with all the decisions made in the Twilight New Moon Eclipse Breaking Dawn books / movies, the point is that I do not always agree with decisions people make in real life. People are flawed. I do however like that the characters are both flawed and heroic and that those characters, though based in fantasy, mimic real-life people. They make the best decisions they can given the situations they are in to the best of their ability. Would I have made the same? No, but though many people do not like to admit it, I'm just as flawed as the next person. There is rarely a "right" decisions to be made in any situation. Only a "right decision for the person given the circumstances" and I believe that Bella made all those choices. She knew that she could not live without Edward even though it may not have been the healthiest. So instead she made the next best decision. Stay with him and make life the best it can possibly be. And in the end, she followed her heart and ended up with the love of her "unlife", a beautiful daughter she would, and almost did, die for, and was able to keep all of her family in her life - even though she did not expect to be able to. I think the Bella / Edward romance mirrors an abusive relationship so much. She gets hurt physically and mentally over and over again, and she always goes rushing back to him. Then when he leaves her, she goes into this weird depression / suicial thing. What kind of example is that for young girls? If you were paying attention, Edward does not tell her who she can and can not be friends with in Twilight New Moon Eclipse Breaking Dawn. He does tell her he does not want her around the werewolves in 'Eclipse', Because the wolves can be dangerous, especially when they are new and still learning to control their abilities, and he is afraid she will get hurt the way Sam's fiance Emily did. Of course, I do not expect you to know any of this, since I doubt you read beyond the first book. Edward spends most of 'Twilight' trying to stay away from Bella, not running her life. Are you sure you actually read the book? Certainly does not seem that way. I think the article writer misses the point of the Twilight New Moon Eclipse Breaking Dawn books and movies. And that is this is Bella's story, not the story of and very female. And nonono Bella is asking that be a standard for every female. Yes, she may lack some heroic Certain attributes, but she's not asking to be held up as a standard for every female on the Earth. This is her story and her story alone. Its all about the romance. That's the meat of the story.
Try thinking of Bella as an individual, and not a woman who serves as a stand-in for all women everywhere. It's not sending a message at all. It's a fictional story about how one person, who happens to be a young woman, experiences life after meeting a supernatural being. Actually, a lot of supernatural beings. Perhaps you do not like her (fictional) personality ... well, there are plenty of people (real and fictional) that I do not care for And Whose life choices I do not agree with, and I'm not particularly Concerned about them influencing the masses. I understand the general worry that a lot of young and "impressionable" girls read the Twilight New Moon Eclipse Breaking Dawn series, well, parents need to be paying attention to what their children read and having some intelligent discourse about the characters and themes in the books. It's not society's job (or EW's, for that matter!) To fill that role. These articles about Bella being a wet blanket helpless in distress are a dime a dozen, and each one is as inaccurate and one-track-minded as the last. I hate how feminists like to turn anything that is remotely beautiful and mangle it into something shameful and pathetic. Read the books, Lady - from a nonbiased perspective. You're full of crap. Bella is strong in all the books - she takes care of her father, and she is always trying to be the one who is protecting others - even though she is physically unable. Crap happens to her, and someone who is stronger comes in to save her. Oh, how awful! That must mean every hero story in the world is anti-feminist. You know what? From now on, male firefighters, EMT's, police officers and the like, whatever you do, DO NOT try to save a chick. You're only being misogynistic and continuing this male conspiracy to keep women under foot! Give me a break, lady. You're clueless. I find it quite hypocritical from some of the haters on here that I see on every article that they Twilight New Moon Eclipse Breaking Dawn demean and put down Twilight to be this senseless, useless piece of garbage and / or cow dung that women should not like or want to touch with a ten foot pole. However, in the same breath, they make it this huge issue grandiose about Edward being a stalker, Jacob being shirtless all the time making it demeaning to men, and now that Bella is a weak character that females should not look up to. Can we make up our minds on Which argument you guys that despise this series so much want to place? It's either a guilty pleasure or not. First of all, I do not see Bella as a weak character or a role model. She is just Bella, for crying out loud.


Read More

apture

September 23, 2010. Powered by Blogger.

    logo

    Preview - Find me on Bloggers.com